Giffords in crosshairs

Palin Is NOT The Real Victim Here

We’ve been reading quite a number of statements and reports coming from every direction (including our own gay blog) in the wake of the shootings of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and a federal judge by 22 year old gunman Jared Lee Loughner. And quite frankly, we are deeply disturbed at how disdainfully Palin’s camp is treating the incident.

Giffords in crosshairs, sarah palin, targets, reload

Palin’s connection to the incident is well documented at this point. The former governor of Alaska listed Rep. Giffords name and congressional district in a gun’s crosshairs on her Takebackthe20 site. Palin has frequently used gun-crazy language in her campaigning. One need only take a glance at her Twitter feed for the proof. Palin, Reload, twitter, tweets

Immediately following the shooting of Rep. Giffords, but before it was known that a 9 year old girl born on 9/11 and a federal judge were also shot and killed along with others in the attack, Palin or her camp removed the image of Gifford in crosshairs from her site. After the media began correctly pointing out that Palin bears political accountability for her dangerous rhetoric and poor taste, conservatives went on the defensive.

Erick Erickson, conservative blogger on, had this gem to say. “By perpetuating the lie – by even treating it as a legitimate topic of consideration to revisit the accusations of violence and hate the media tried to run with prior to the November election – that the right and the tea party incited this evil act, the left and media may very well incite violence against the right.”

Excuse me? The media and the left are creating the potential for violence by pointing out that Palin and conservatives have been creating the potential for violence? Come again?

Palin’s camp added that she was not responsible, and that the gun’s crosshairs used in the graphic on her site weren’t crosshairs at all, but surveyor marks. “We never ever, ever intended it to be gun sights”, said a Palin aide. It Gets Better creator, Dan Savage points out Palin’s pants are on fire. Ms. Palin and her staff are lying. Again, her Twitter feed has the proof.

Palin bullseye, crosshairs, tweet

Why at this point is the media even floating the possibility that Palin is without fault in creating a climate that encourages crazed gunmen to attack elected officials? Documentary filmmaker Michael Moore yesterday tweeted, “If a Detroit Muslim put a map on the web w/crosshairs on 20 pols, then 1 of them got shot, where would he b sitting right now? Just asking.” It’s hardly eloquent, but he’s absolutely correct. A Unicorn Booty reader posted on our Facebook wall after our original report on the shooting, “Palin didn’t pull the trigger, but Osama didn’t fly the planes.” People are clearly seeing an obvious accountability and connection here that Palin’s camp is frantically denying exists.

Michael Moore tweet, sarah palin, crosshairs, reload

Another Palin spokeswoman, Rebecca Monsour defended her boss to conservative host Tammy Bruce, “We saw it really quickly and we said, ‘Yeah, that’s fine, that’s great. We had never even imagined or occurred to us that anybody would interpret it as violence, because it’s not. And you know what, targeting congressional swing districts, targeting swing races, just is part of our Democratic process. Everybody does this. And it is the way the process is supposed to work. What is not supposed to happen in our democratic system is for lone, crazy gunmen to commit mass murder like this, like we saw today.”

Well, guess what? Someone DID interpret it as violent. Half the country has! Whether or not the gunman did as well is unknown at this time. It may be in time. That hardly absolves Palin of accountability. Palin’s ignorance to perceive her own rhetoric as violent and dangerous doesn’t make her innocent!

Conservatives, and Palin supporters suggesting that we are the dangerous ones for rightfully pointing out that she has been using violent language for political gain is quite frankly insane.

We’ll leave you with this sadly prophetic video of Rep. Giffords warning in March, “Things for example, where on Sarah Palin’s targeted list, but the thing is the way she has it depicted has the crosshairs of a gunsight over our district. And when people do that, they’ve got to realize that there’s consequences to that action.”

  • Jeri Alley

    I’ve been seeing this denial a lot in the past 24hrs. but the thing that clearly denounces the Palin (aide’s) claim of not intending those to be gun sights is the video of Giffords addressing the issue of being on Palin’s PAC target map w/”crosshairs over our district”. Now Palin, who always jumps on the opportunity to fight – didn’t respond to this offensively incorrect statement. Pretty clear that Palin is (unsuccessfully) attempting damage control.

  • Richard Hunt

    I agree that Palin has used guns in her campaigns all along. Did she assume that someone would take her “Crosshairs” and act on them, probably not. However, doesn’t she have advisors to think about things like that? Stories of people taking “ideas” to the extreme happen a lot. This is just another example of the poor judgement that Sarah Palin and her advisors/Tea Partiers use. If this doesn’t scare voters away from her/them, I don’t know what will.

    On another note, UnicornBooty, your article came across on my computer screen as black printing on a dark charcoal grey background. Very hard to read without having to highlight every paragraph first. You might think of a better graphic art concept.

  • Booty The Unicorn

    @Richard. We’re still ironing out a few kinks in the site. It’s not loading correctly on some browsers, but should be fixed within the week.

    We just couldn’t contain ourselves any longer and wanted to get the new site out!

    Thanks for letting me know!