Obama, Thea Spyer, widow, lesbian, marriage equality

The Widowed Lesbian Who Changed Obama’s Mind On DOMA

Obama, Thea Spyer, widow, lesbian, marriage equality
Edith Windsor is my new role model.

Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer spent forty years together before legally marrying in Canada. Two years after their wedding, Thea passed away due to escalating complications resulting from Multiple Sclerosis. Even though the state law in New York, where the couple lived, recognized their Canadian marriage, the federal government issued Edith with $363,053 tax bill.

The bill, in the tune of hundred of thousands of dollars, would not have been issued had the two women been in a heterosexual marriage.

“I couldn’t believe that our government would charge me $350,000 because I was married to a woman and not a man,” Windsor, 81, said in a video statement from the American Civil Liberties Union, which is helping to represent her.

When Edith filed a lawsuit against the federal government, President Obama was forced to reconcile his opinions on the constitutionality of such a law that would charge a partnered widow of 42 years who lived in a state that recognized her international marriage nearly $400,000 for the sole fact that her deceased partner was not a man. When you put the issue in plain English like that, there’s really not much to be said in defense of such a law.

It’s unconstitutional by any measure. It’s also just wrong. It’s mean. It’s UnAmerican.

Windsor’s suit to reclaim Spyer’s money from the U.S. is one of two cited by Attorney General Eric Holder in a Feb. 23 announcement that President Barack Obama’s administration would not defend the law in court.

The U.S. won’t argue the act is constitutional in Windsor’s case in federal court in New York and in a Connecticut case involving seven plaintiffs, Holder said in a press statement and letter to House Speaker John Boehner, an Ohio Republican. Notices went to the judges Feb. 25.

We’re so proud of Edith Windsor for sharing her beautiful love story and your memories of Thea Spyer with us. Thank you so much for standing up for your rights, for all of our rights, and for what’s right. You inspire me, Edith.

Via Business Week

  • Thomas Baggett

    This is exactly what Gay Rights activists have been needing: a conflict of State vs. Federal taxation legislation that will precede any true definitions of marriage/civil union equality between heterosexual and homosexual couples. This type of conflict removes the legitimacy of a religious argument entirely from the topic of conversation. There’s nothing less holy than pure, hard cash. Ask any hooker.

    But to the point: this is the game to watch, folks. This type of case will spearhead its way directly to the Supreme Court due to appeal options and both sides looking for a win. The Feds will seek the money and the Lezzies will seek the honey (well, one lezzie now, and she’s so cute!). If the Supreme Court sides with the State of New York, then the ability of the Federal government to undefine marriage crumbles, and States Rights become the end-all be-all for this issue. Or the Supreme Court can side with the Feds, which may indeed invalidate all gay marriages across the 50 states, which will affirm DOMA in Washington, D.C. Or there are other outcomes, all of which equally fascinating.

    So what do we do? We watch. The President will watch this carefully, I promise you. This one case has all the muscle needed to remove Obama from even being relevant in the discussion of marriage equality. The courts, by close examination of an IRS audit, will be forced to take one side or another.

    It always comes down to money, folks. Be it the environment, states rights, energy or civil liberties–it’s the dollar that demands the scene. But it’s the courts that will make the call.

    I’ll bring the popcorn.

  • 🙂